Audius’ new start is its blockchain streaming streaming service that focuses on the needs of independent artists. It is full of kahiti material.
Audius’ website says “Music platforms are the best, while listening to what artists and sponsors don’t want from companies and big labels” that loaded the tracks “should never be , or to be removed. ” TechCrunch named Audius ‘moving block block’secret sauce«Although Yahoo Finance claims to be«properly addressing motivational needs in the enterprise. “But one of the biggest problems in music today is copyright. Audius has infringing information – such as the unlicensed model of Ariana Grande and Iggy Azalea” Problem “- if the resources are right promotion that the company cannot take.
Audius is the direct competitor to Audience SoundCloud, which may explain its problems. SoundCloud is a new, ever-coming range of artists, hosting unknown moments, such as La Chainsmokers and Lorde, but also a mix of immersive resources: remixes, mashups, and all songs. . Although SoundCloud has a system content rating, since 2011, the most difficult copyright complaints started after signing the labels, usually and unexpected resultsSo hardcore users are starting to dig into other areas. Attempting to appeal to these users, Audius encountered another problem.
«They say ‘We have no power to harm you.’ What I hear myself say is, ‘It can be very difficult for us to take things that are wrong with you,’ says Kevin Casini, an entertainment law professor at Quinnipiac at the Law School in Connecticut. . “They’re trying to talk as if they’re talking to people who are afraid of this worm. They also say, ‘Hey, this is a new place you can, at least for a while. in a moment, upload something, and we will not look to see what it is. ‘ They know this is something that is fast approaching for them, it represents and promotes for people Tino You know what you are saying, ‘You can come here and do it.’
Audius says this is a project for those who have used SoundCloud. “We’re really seeing ourselves joining a platform like SoundCloud right now,” says Audius CEO Roneil Rumburg The label. Audius may have had a chance. The creeps of free artists were raised thanks to a pay-as-you-go contract launched by SoundCloud, you can change the terms of payment without notifying the technicians preventing them from suing the company.
But the problem is, whatever Audius says is a problem with the block – more precisely between sponsors and artists, visibility, individual benefit – can be done without prevent. After all, this The this is done without a block on Bandcamp and Patreon, among others.
No. right the real problems in the music world: it is bad, not standard, lack of access to donors, unrecognized records required to be balanced, copyright infringement of types and varieties, and lack of audio and fingerprint equipment. Human errors and metadata the average number of musicians who do not have a paycheck, e.g. Recently, the fraudster was able to install the the Kanye West album was not released on Apple Music to cry Owner Artists They can take advantage of the efforts of others to run services by simply recording songs to edit sounds, such as by moving the music up or down.
Blockchain can not solve these, and in some cases, it can be very bad.
“On the surface, a lot of people think, ‘this block is perfect,'” says Jack Spallone, ConsenSys’ chief product manager. “Not at all. Yes [la industria de la música] I can use Excel well, it may not be a problem.
Blocks Blocks have the ability to strike a headache.
Audius is trying to avoid the problem of SoundCloud copyright instead of encouraging the user to upload information. Its open source protocol, built on blockchain, means that the responsibility for hosting and delivering the submitted content is shared among the people registered as node administrators. They want this method to protect them from the loading and unloading of large labels. This is an open question. Copying and distribution was started by the user but by the system separate from some of the previous companies, but already a legitimate argument for others.
There are other red flags and the way Audius is configured: confirmed by the company Symbol no system content ID was entered to capture the infringement. While it is possible to file charges for the offense, there is no way for Audius to remove the infringing material, nor is there any way to file a claim for infringement on the website. “There is a formal process involved,” said a company representative.
Whether or not this business model is in court, judging by major publishers or labels would be easy to dismiss Audius ’big city. If you are buried with the judgments, you have no money for anything else. It is still necessary to understand how the awards and other owners of those rights to Audius, in a short time, are full of violations.
Ed Sheeran’s original songs are now available to play Audius, as well as songs registered to labels such as Dim Mak and Spinnin ‘and the results of unauthorized remixes using material from Kanye West and Eric Prydz. None of these artists are paid for this use. After all, according to Audius, no one has been paid yet. The approval of fixed costs “TBD for the next few years,” Rumburg said.
Even if Audius is not directly responsible for the crime, he can still be held irresponsible if the court finds that it is promoting “its use to infringe copyright, as evidenced by the clarity of the statement and other enforcement action to infringe the offenses.”
Experts are skeptical if the blockade is enough to protect Audius from washing the hands of bad actors. In the past, services, such as Koka use similar arguments. Finally, Grokster does not host all types of resources; The language was only allowed for people to share some files with others. But they lost that war in the Supreme Court, and it was closed in 2005. “That’s all the information about peer-to-peer services has been said, not a big deal for them,” he says. said John Bergmayer, legal director for Public Education. .
Audius sees his role as an open source software manufacturer, Rumburg says. “We provide artists and listeners with the tools they need to interact with each other. We can help run that community, but we are not able to provide information or code management. or. “
I would ask Bergmayer if that was enough to keep the company afloat. “I like a copyrighted approach, but I do not want people to lose these legal arguments,” he said. “If you are a violator you are violating something you are doing something, something, now or in the past by some way of managing that, maybe you have a court case.”
Of all the art forms that can retain copyright, music is one of the hardest things to do. For starters, each song has its own melodies Next article copyright: one for composing and one for writing. Most songs have a lot of people and entities that have to pay both sides every time a song is played – from the record label to the composers to the people who are doing the music.
Here is an example Originally used by Annie Lin, Senior Vice President at Twitch: Katy Perry “Desktop.” Capitol Records has “Shooting” records, but there are five composers and five different music producers who have the weights of composing rights. Most musicians like this, consider the logistical difficulties of prosecuting everyone from hundreds of regions of the world, with different copyright laws, to move to prevention.
But can Audius attract an audience?
This may be the reason Audius removed SoundCloud. The simplest way for a blockchain to be used with music streaming services is to focus on composing compositions, that is, recorded songs, owned and operated by a single entity (i.e., most of the above- and upcoming artists). The market is still one of all music.
In addition, the focus on the niche market means that the economy will compete with the likes of Spotify, Apple Music, Amazon, yes, SoundCloud, all of which have license contracts and major leagues. to provide significant feedback. People get music from these services for $ 10 a month, and they refuse to sign up for another service, and without the reputable credentials of famous artists it is difficult.
“Well, well, we don’t have to deal with big leagues,” says George Howard, associate professor of music / management business at the University of Music and Brown University, outlining this strategy. wide. “We have to stand up, a little musical instrument and a band of artists that no one has ever heard of, they wonder why, no one comes to our event, because they do not understand the benefits of the network. “
There is also a problem with the presence of a blockchain streaming service. How can a copyright holder determine who is responsible for the infringement, other than issuing a petition? How does the service meet the DMCA notice that information cannot be included in the ban? What is the role of the node administrator in determining malicious resources that the administrator has not yet released? Will users submit?
Blockchain technology may be useful in some cases of music. For example, it can be made useless and small digital output output or used to pay and distribute funds to investors, such as Imogen Heap performed on his last tour. But using it for streaming music service is not an issue, and it is said that this is a solution to the serious problems that musicians face that are just lies. “They don’t understand copyright law,” Howard says of Audius. “They have a barrier to harming the big actors, and that is the only thing that will break and burn. The problem with this is, at this point, it sends a signal that the block and the music are not working properly. “